Experimental evidence for the role of sexual selection in the evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in the dung beetle,Onthophagus taurus

A role for sexual selection in the evolution of insect cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) is suggested by observations of selection acting on male CHCs during female mate choice. However, evidence that CHCs evolve in response to sexual selection is generally lacking, and there is a need to extend our understanding beyond well‐studied taxa. Experimental evolution offers a powerful approach to investigate the effect of sexual selection on the evolution of insect CHCs. We conducted such an experiment using the dung beetle, Onthophagus taurus. After six, 12 and 21 generations of experimental evolution, we measured the CHCs of beetles from three populations subject to sexual selection and three populations within which sexual selection had been removed via enforced monogamy. We found that the male CHC profile responded to the experimental removal of sexual selection. Conversely, the CHC profile of females responded to the presence of sexual selection but not to its removal. These results show that sexual selection can be an important mechanism affecting the evolution of insect CHCs and that male and female CHCs can evolve independently.     

Nanoscale Subsynaptic Domains Underlie the Organization of the Inhibitory Synapse

1. Download high-res image (206KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

The integrative effects of behavior and morphology on amphibian movement

Animal movement and dispersal are key factors in population dynamics and support complex ecosystem processes like cross‐boundary subsidies. Juvenile dispersal is an important mechanism for many species and often involves navigation in unfamiliar habitats. For species that metamorphose, such as amphibians, this transition from aquatic to terrestrial environments involves the growth and use of new morphological traits (e.g., legs). These traits strongly impact the fundamental ability of an organism to move in novel landscapes, but innate behaviors can regulate choices that result in the realized movements expressed. By assessing the integrative role of morphology and behavior, we can improve our understanding of juvenile movement, particularly in understudied organisms like amphibians. We assessed the roles of morphological (snout‐vent length and relative leg length) and performance (maximal jump distance) traits in shaping the free movement paths, measured through fluorescent powder tracking, in three anuran species, Pacific treefrog (Hyliola regilla), Western toad (Anaxyrus boreas), and Cascades frog (Rana cascadae). We standardized the measurement of these traits to compare the relative role of species' innate differences versus physical traits in shaping movement. Innate differences, captured by species identity, were the most significant factor influencing movement paths via total movement distance and path sinuosity. Relative leg length was an important contributor but significantly interacted with species identity. Maximal jump performance, which was significantly predicted by morphological traits, was not an important factor in movement behavior relative to species identity. The importance of species identity and associated behavioral differences in realized movement provide evidence for inherent species differences being central to the dispersal and movement of these species. This behavior may stem from niche partitioning of these sympatric species, yet it also calls into question assumptions generalizing anuran movement behavior. These species‐level effects are important in framing differences as past research is applied in management planning.     

Rerouting of Plant Late Endocytic Trafficking Toward a Pathogen Interface

A number of plant pathogenic and symbiotic microbes produce specialized cellular structures that invade host cells where they remain enveloped by host‐derived membranes. The mechanisms underlying the biogenesis and functions of host–microbe interfaces are poorly understood. Here, we show that plant late endocytic trafficking is diverted toward the extrahaustorial membrane (EHM); a host–pathogen interface that develops in plant cells invaded by Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. A late endosome and tonoplast marker protein Rab7 GTPase RabG3c, but not a tonoplast‐localized sucrose transporter, is recruited to the EHM, suggesting specific rerouting of vacuole‐targeted late endosomes to a host–pathogen interface. We revealed the dynamic nature of this process by showing that, upon activation, a cell surface immune receptor traffics toward the haustorial interface. Our work provides insight into the biogenesis of the EHM and reveals dynamic processes that recruit membrane compartments and immune receptors to this host–pathogen interface.      

EpiProfile Quantifies Histone Peptides With Modifications by Extracting Retention Time and Intensity in High-resolution Mass Spectra

Histone post-translational modifications contribute to chromatin function through their chemical properties which influence chromatin structure and their ability to recruit chromatin interacting proteins. Nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (nanoLC-MS/MS) has emerged as the most suitable technology for global histone modification analysis because of the high sensitivity and the high mass accuracy of this approach that provides confident identification. However, analysis of histones with this method is even more challenging because of the large number and variety of isobaric histone peptides and the high dynamic range of histone peptide abundances. Here, we introduce EpiProfile, a software tool that discriminates isobaric histone peptides using the distinguishing fragment ions in their tandem mass spectra and extracts the chromatographic area under the curve using previous knowledge about peptide retention time. The accuracy of EpiProfile was evaluated by analysis of mixtures containing different ratios of synthetic histone peptides. In addition to label-free quantification of histone peptides, EpiProfile is flexible and can quantify different types of isotopically labeled histone peptides. EpiProfile is unique in generating layouts (i.e. relative retention time) of histone peptides when compared with manual quantification of the data and other programs (such as Skyline), filling the need of an automatic and freely available tool to quantify labeled and non-labeled modified histone peptides. In summary, EpiProfile is a valuable nanoflow liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution tandem mass spectrometry-based quantification tool for histone peptides, which can also be adapted to analyze nonhistone protein samples.The nucleosome, the basic unit of chromatin, consists of 147 base pairs of DNA wrapped around histone proteins (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4). Histones play vital roles in chromatin, interacting with many signaling proteins and chromatin-structural proteins through various post-translational modifications (PTMs)¹ (1–3). There are numerous PTMs on histones, including methylation (mono - me1, di - me2, tri - me3), acetylation (ac), phosphorylation (ph), ubiquitination, and SUMOylation (4). Histone PTMs can affect chromatin function, and therefore influence processes such as gene accessibility, DNA repair and chromosome condensation. Moreover, histone PTMs cross-talk in a synergistic manner to fine-tune gene expression (5). Therefore, quantification of histone PTMs has become a high priority to investigate cell regulation and epigenetics (6).Traditionally, antibody-based methods (e.g. Western blot) have been used to analyze histone modifications (7), which have multiple disadvantages. First, antibodies are not available for every new PTM discovered. Second, PTMs on neighboring amino acids (e.g. H3K9me1–3 and H3S10ph) may prevent antibody binding, a phenomenon called epitope occlusion. Third, the quantification of PTMs via antibody-based methods is not sensitive to small differences (e.g. <twofold). Mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a sensitive and efficient technique to detect known and novel PTMs (8). The high mass accuracy and the high speed of modern mass spectrometers allow for sensitive, confident, and accurate peptide quantification when coupled with nanoflow liquid chromatography (nanoLC).NanoLC-MS/MS analysis of protein digests (i.e. bottom-up MS) is nowadays a mature and widely applied technology. Data-dependent acquisition is the most commonly adopted MS acquisition method to identify peptides via bottom-up MS (9–12), generating MS1 and MS2 spectra. Nevertheless, histone proteins are particularly challenging to analyze by using the generalized bottom-up workflow. As histones are rich with lysines and arginines, tryptic digest of histones generates short peptides that are difficult to be retained on C18 columns. To improve histone peptide retention, the unmodified and mono-methylated lysines and peptide N terminus can be selectively chemically propionylated (13–16), preventing tryptic digest after lysine to generate longer peptides. Moreover, peptide identification through traditional database searches leads to a large number of false positives, as allowing several dynamic modifications (e.g. me1/me2/me3, ac, ph) dramatically increases the number of molecular candidates and thus the possibility to achieve a false hit (12). Therefore, software tools that quantify histone peptides require additional data to correctly map a given peptide, such as previous knowledge of peptide retention time.Quantification of histone peptides is particularly challenging because of presence of isobaric peptides, near isobaric PTMs such as tri-methylation (42.047 Da) and acetylation (42.011 Da), and low abundant species. Previous knowledge about relative peptide retention time (RT) enables differentiation between species close in mass and therefore selection of the correct peak for integration of the area of the chromatographic peak (i.e. area under curve or AUC). However, determination of peptide RT might be difficult because of their low abundance though acid extraction was performed to purify histones. This problem can be solved by using isotopically labeled synthetic histone peptides (17), or data independent approaches (18). When using relative retention time information to assign peak identities, reproducible nanoLC is crucial, especially because some isobaric peptides co-elute. In this case, the MS acquisition method must perform targeted MS2 for the co-eluting isobaric peptides at the specific time that they elute. These species can be discriminated and quantified based on the intensity of fragment ions unique to each species. For instance, the peptides KacSTGGKAPR (H3K9ac) and KSTGGKacAPR (H3K14ac) have the same mass and overlap at the nanoLC elution (the full protein sequence of human canonical histone H3 and H4 are shown in Fig. 1A). Thus, the co-eluting isobaric peptides could not be quantified separately based on the MS1 signal, but the unique fragment ions present in MS2 spectra allow them to be quantified individually.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.Histones are a challenge for quantitative mass spectrometry analyses. A, Human histone H3.1 and H4 protein sequences. B, Spline fitting to calculate AUC: blue lines are the original peaks and pink lines are the fitted peaks. C, An example of isobaric PTM modified peptides. The above MS2 is matched with H3K18ac, and the same MS2 is also matched with H3K23ac below. D, The workflow of EpiProfile: inputting precursor m/z and charge state, extracting elution profiles, selecting the correct chromatographic peak, calculating AUC, and outputting quantification tables and figures.There have been few computational investigations attempting to solve the problem of quantifying co-eluting isobaric peptides. DiMaggio et al. used a mixed integer linear optimization (MILP) framework to quantify partially co-eluting isobaric histone peptides from electron transfer dissociation (ETD) spectra (19). The framework is comprised of two MILP models: (1) enumerating the entire space of the modified forms that satisfy a given peptide mass and (2) determining the relative composition of the modified forms in the spectrum. Another study by Guan et al. identified isobaric peptides by searching ETD MS/MS spectra for ions representing all possible configurations of modified peptides using a visual assistance program. The relative abundances of these species were estimated by using a nonnegative least squares procedure (20). Other quantification programs can also perform accurate peak picking, but are commonly not as suitable for heavily modified and isobaric histone peptides (e.g. Skyline) (21). These software programs are unable to provide the layouts of histone peptides (i.e. relative RTs) or discriminate all isobaric modified peptides, two tasks that are vital for full characterization of a histone sample.In this study, we developed a new quantification program named EpiProfile. EpiProfile extracts ion chromatography for known histone peptides by using previous knowledge about their elution profiles. Moreover, it discriminates and quantifies the isobaric histone peptides by resolving the linear equations listed with the peak heights of unique fragment ions between the two modification sites in the MS2 spectra (e.g. ions between H3K9ac and H3K14ac). We evaluated the accuracy of EpiProfile by mixing different ratios of synthetic histone peptides, and then tested EpiProfile by analyzing nanoLC-MS/MS data sets of the following samples: purified histones from HeLa cells, a synthetic histone peptide library, and histone peptides labeled during cell growth with ¹³C-labeled glucose media or stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (22). We compared EpiProfile to manual quantification of the data, and also with the openly available program Skyline. We found that manual quantification is obviously time-consuming and that Skyline cannot generate the layouts of histone peptides and cannot discriminate four or six-component isobaric peptides, a common occurrence in histone data. Moreover, EpiProfile is highly flexible, and thus it can be used to analyze various protein samples, including isotopically labeled peptides and nonhistone data sets.